Post reblogged from NUUT.co with 37 notes
Wasn’t it just a few months ago that Tumblr was telling us to protest censorship from bills like SOPA and PIPA, then they go about proposing their own forms of censorship when it comes to individuals who express interest in body harm and mutilation?
No censorship means no censorship. It doesn’t just apply to governments; it applies to every individual, company, and organization. I have a deep respect and love for Tumblr, but these two staff posts (partially) contradict themselves (if Option 1 is enacted).
tumblr is a private organization
private organization can say “we do not support and will not host encouragement of destructive behaviors”
very different from gov’t attempting to shut down internet in name of IP law
this is pretty simple yo
Source: kevinnuut
Ted nails it. People that confuse censorship with a private company’s terms of service is a REAL BIG pet-peeve of mine....
Censorship coming from a private company is completely different that censorship coming from the government. If Tumblr,...
pro-ED blogs. Thy make me feel miserable. The aim...be to further isolate those who are...
companies should be able...want to allow on...sites...
I agree. The argument can be made...is a private company
Here’s my take: Blogs promoting bulimia, anorexia and self-harm are horrible, but I’ve come to understand
private organization private organization can say “we do not support...will not host...